How did petroleum form?
The opinion that has prevailed among scientists since the 1870's is called the biogenic theory. This "holds that biological debris1 buried in sediments2 decays3 into oil and natural gas in the long course of time and that this petroleum then becomes
concentrated in the pore4 space of sedimentary rocks in the uppermost layers of the Earth's crust." This process then produces petroleum, whose main components are hydrocarbons – that is, hydrogen5 and carbon,6 However, since the 1970s this theory has at times been challenged by some scientists.
In the August 20, 2002, issue of Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, the article "The Genesis of Hydrocarbons and the Origin of Petroleum" was published. The authors argue that the origin of natural petroleum must occur at depths that are "well into the mantle7 of the Earth" and not at the much shallower depths generally accepted. Physicist Thomas Gold has suggested some controversial theories and explains his reasons in detail in his book “The Deep Hot Biosphere – The Myth of Fossil Fuels”. He writes: "The theory of the biological origin of hydrocarbons was so favoured in the United States and in much of Europe that it effectively shut out work on the opposing viewpoint. This was not the case in the countries of the former Soviet Union.” That was “probably because the revered Russian chemist Mendeleyev had supported the abiogenic (not biological) view. The arguments he presented are even stronger today, given the greatly expanded information we now have.” What is the abiogenic view?
Gold states: "The abiogenic theory holds that hydrocarbons were a component of the material that formed the earth, through accretion of solids,8 some 4.5 milliard years ago." According to this theory, the elements of petroleum have been deep in the earth since the earth's formation.
1 debris - (зд.) останки;
2 sediment – осадочная порода;
3 decay - разлагаться;
4 pore - пустоты (в породе);
5 hydrogen - водород;
6 carbon - углерод;
7 mantle -мантия;
8 accretion of solids -(геол.) аккреция, нанос пород.
You are a Professor of chemistry. Tell your students about:
a) biogenic theory of the oil formation
b) abiogenic theory of the oil formation
Which theory would you think to be more reasonable?
- My speciality
- My speciality
- Dialogue 1
- Dialogue 2
- Oil. How it affects us
- How much oil, and where is it?
- How did petroleum form?
- How is oil extracted?
- How is oil transported?
- A blessing and a curse?
- Will It Ever Run Out?
- Oil pipelines in russia: yesterday, today and tomorrow
- Tomorrow’s techiology
- The Alaska Pipeline